Independent resource: Independent Antigravity Guide is an unofficial tutorial and editorial site. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or operated by Google. Google Antigravity, Gemini, and related marks are trademarks of Google LLC.

2025 Comparison Guide

Antigravity vs Cursor vs Windsurf

Which AI-powered IDE is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and performance.

Quick Comparison

Feature
AntigravityFree
Cursor$20/month
Windsurf$15/month
Autonomous Agents
Multi-Agent Orchestration~
Browser Automation
Context Window1M+ tokens200K128K
Artifact Generation~
VS Code Compatibility
Multi-Model Support
PriceFree$20/month$15/month

✓ = Full support | ~ = Partial/Limited | ✗ = Not available

Core Philosophy

Different approaches to AI-assisted development

Antigravity

Agent-First Automation

Treats AI agents as first-class citizens. Agents autonomously plan, execute, and verify complex development tasks across editor, terminal, and browser.

Best for:

Full automation, large codebases, rapid prototyping

Cursor

AI-Augmented Editing

Enhances manual coding with AI predictions and suggestions. Developer remains in full control while AI accelerates common tasks.

Best for:

Precise editing, strict conventions, daily coding

Windsurf

Flow-Based Development

Focuses on developer flow with contextual AI assistance. Cascade feature provides step-by-step guidance through complex tasks.

Best for:

Learning, guided development, smaller projects

Antigravity vs Cursor: Deep Dive

Antigravity Advantages

  • Completely Free

    No subscription fees, no usage limits during public preview

  • 1M+ Token Context

    Gemini 3 handles entire monorepos without truncation

  • Full Autonomy

    Agents work independently across editor, terminal, and browser

  • Artifact Verification

    Screenshots, plans, and recordings for trust and verification

Cursor Advantages

  • Mature Ecosystem

    Longer track record with enterprise-grade stability

  • Composer Model

    Proprietary AI model optimized specifically for coding

  • Developer Control

    AI assists but developer maintains full control

  • Fast Completions

    ~30 second average task completion time

Performance Benchmarks

Real-world performance comparison

SWE-bench Verified

Antigravity76.2%
Cursor68.5%
Windsurf52.3%

Feature Development Speed

Antigravity42s avg
Cursor68s avg
Windsurf85s avg

*Next.js + Supabase backend feature development

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Antigravity If...

  • You want maximum automation
  • Working with large codebases
  • Need rapid prototyping
  • Budget-conscious
  • Want browser automation

Choose Cursor If...

  • Prefer manual control
  • Need strict code conventions
  • Daily coding tasks
  • Enterprise environment
  • Existing VS Code user

Choose Windsurf If...

  • Learning to code
  • Want guided development
  • Working on smaller projects
  • Prefer step-by-step flow
  • Budget alternative to Cursor

Learn Antigravity Independently

Use our independent notes to compare agent-first development tools before visiting official product sites.

No credit card required • Windows, macOS, Linux